xgEdge

Fantasy Premier League

Best value in the game

Every player the game would let you field, projected over the rounds ahead and priced against them. The board is ranked on the model's own currency; the value column is one click away.

Best value in the game

John Egan

DEF · HUL · 4.1m · owned by 7.0%

3.87

Value

every bar on one axis of 0 to 5.0

That is 15.9 projected points over the rounds ahead, weighted so the round in front of him counts for most.

Gameweek 6 · 8-round window · feed of 04/10 06:00

John Egan is the best value on the board: 3.87 points per million, from 15.9 over 8 rounds at 4.1m.

Price

4.1m

What the game charges for him today, which is what the value column divides by.

Ahead

15.9

His weighted score over the next 8 rounds, and the currency this board is ranked in.

Own

7.0%

The share of managers already holding him.

The top five on this board

The board as your controls leave it — the same five that open the table below.

  1. Ranked 1 John Egan
    DEF HUL vs
    15.9 Ahead
    Value
    3.87
    Price
    4.1m
    Own
    7.0%
    3.1
    1. EVE (H)
    2. FUL (A)
    3. BRE (H)
    4. IPS (H)
    5. ARS (A)
    6. BHA (H)
    7. CRY (A)
    8. NFO (H)
  2. Ranked 2 Konstantinos Tzolakis
    GKP HUL vs
    15.4 Ahead
    Value
    3.28
    Price
    4.7m
    Own
    13%
    3.1
    1. EVE (H)
    2. FUL (A)
    3. BRE (H)
    4. IPS (H)
    5. ARS (A)
    6. BHA (H)
    7. CRY (A)
    8. NFO (H)
  3. Ranked 3 Oli McBurnie
    FWD HUL vs
    14.5 Ahead
    Value
    2.64
    Price
    5.5m
    Own
    1.9%
    3.1
    1. EVE (H)
    2. FUL (A)
    3. BRE (H)
    4. IPS (H)
    5. ARS (A)
    6. BHA (H)
    7. CRY (A)
    8. NFO (H)
  4. Ranked 4 Mohamed Belloumi
    MID HUL vs
    13.2 Ahead
    Value
    2.58
    Price
    5.1m
    Own
    5.2%
    3.1
    1. EVE (H)
    2. FUL (A)
    3. BRE (H)
    4. IPS (H)
    5. ARS (A)
    6. BHA (H)
    7. CRY (A)
    8. NFO (H)
  5. Ranked 5 Semi Ajayi
    DEF HUL vs
    12.9 Ahead
    Value
    3.08
    Price
    4.2m
    Own
    14%
    3.1
    1. EVE (H)
    2. FUL (A)
    3. BRE (H)
    4. IPS (H)
    5. ARS (A)
    6. BHA (H)
    7. CRY (A)
    8. NFO (H)
Position
All GKP DEF MID FWD
Minutes played
Any 90+ 270+ 450+ 900+
At least
Any Very safe Safe Rotation risk
Rounds ahead
3 rounds 5 rounds 8 rounds
Price
Enter your squad to mark what you already own and what you could afford →
Showing 8 of 8 players 8 of 487 match your filters Clear filters
1 John Egan 15.9
DEF vs HUL · 4.1m 92%
Value
3.87
Pts
4.0
xGI
0.01
Own
7.0%
Mins
437
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
  6. BHA (H)
  7. CRY (A)
  8. NFO (H)
2 Konstantinos Tzolakis 15.4
GKP vs HUL · 4.7m 92%
Value
3.28
Pts
3.8
xGI
0.00
Own
13%
Mins
450
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
  6. BHA (H)
  7. CRY (A)
  8. NFO (H)
3 Oli McBurnie 14.5
FWD vs HUL · 5.5m 92%
Value
2.64
Pts
3.6
xGI
0.28
Own
1.9%
Mins
441
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
  6. BHA (H)
  7. CRY (A)
  8. NFO (H)
4 Mohamed Belloumi 13.2
MID vs HUL · 5.1m 92%
Value
2.58
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.26
Own
5.2%
Mins
394
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
  6. BHA (H)
  7. CRY (A)
  8. NFO (H)
5 Semi Ajayi 12.9
DEF vs HUL · 4.2m 92%
Value
3.08
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.14
Own
14%
Mins
423
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
  6. BHA (H)
  7. CRY (A)
  8. NFO (H)
6 Regan Slater 12.8
MID vs HUL · 4.5m 92%
Value
2.84
Pts
3.2
xGI
0.16
Own
5.2%
Mins
437
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
  6. BHA (H)
  7. CRY (A)
  8. NFO (H)
7 Ryan Giles 12.0
DEF vs HUL · 4.0m 92%
Value
2.99
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.09
Own
2.9%
Mins
444
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
  6. BHA (H)
  7. CRY (A)
  8. NFO (H)
8 Lewie Coyle 9.4
DEF vs HUL · 4.0m 92%
Value
2.35
Pts
2.4
xGI
0.05
Own
0.7%
Mins
348
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
  6. BHA (H)
  7. CRY (A)
  8. NFO (H)
each row's Ahead, drawn to scale every bar on one axis of 0 to 20

What this board is, and what it is not

Every ranking here is in expected points or in the weighted score for the rounds ahead, which are the units this model is measured in. The value column is those figures restated over a price — it is a way of scanning the board, and nothing on this site backtests it.

Bonus points are projected nowhere on this site, so they are in none of these figures.

The window score is points times weight rather than points. The 8 weights sum to 4.16, so a window score is never a total anybody could add up from the per-round figures beside it.

The price is what he costs today. What the game would pay for a player who has risen is less, so a value figure is an estimate of a purchase rather than of a sale.

The board is every player the game would let you field, the flagged included — whether a doubtful player is worth picking is a judgement the projection makes with his published chance of playing, not one made by hiding him.

What is measured here, and what is not

  • Measured The projected points

    Replayed against gameweek 2 after it was played: an average miss of 1.617 points a player, against 1.842 for “predict what he has averaged so far”, over 456 players. Recorded Sunday, 6 September 2026 and refreshed by hand, so the date is part of the claim.

Mind if we count your visit?

We use Google Analytics only to see how many people visit and which pages they read. It loads after you allow it — no ads, no tracking across other sites. What we collect