xgEdge

Fantasy Premier League

Best value in the game

Every player the game would let you field, projected over the rounds ahead and priced against them. The board is ranked on the model's own currency; the value column is one click away.

Best value in the game

Bobby Thomas

DEF · COV · 4.0m · owned by 8.5%

3.40

Value

every bar on one axis of 0 to 5.0

That is 13.6 projected points over the rounds ahead, weighted so the round in front of him counts for most.

Gameweek 6 · 5-round window · feed of 01/10 11:39

Bobby Thomas is the best value on the board: 3.40 points per million, from 13.6 over 5 rounds at 4.0m.

Price

4.0m

What the game charges for him today, which is what the value column divides by.

Ahead

13.6

His weighted score over the next 5 rounds, and the currency this board is ranked in.

Own

8.5%

The share of managers already holding him.

The top five on this board

The board as your controls leave it — the same five that open the table below.

  1. Ranked 1 Bobby Thomas
    DEF COV vs
    13.6 Ahead
    Value
    3.40
    Price
    4.0m
    Own
    8.5%
    3.0
    1. NEW (H)
    2. TOT (A)
    3. FUL (H)
    4. SUN (H)
    5. EVE (A)
  2. Ranked 2 Jay Dasilva
    DEF COV vs
    11.0 Ahead
    Value
    2.75
    Price
    4.0m
    Own
    0.7%
    3.0
    1. NEW (H)
    2. TOT (A)
    3. FUL (H)
    4. SUN (H)
    5. EVE (A)
  3. Ranked 3 Carl Rushworth
    GKP COV vs
    10.8 Ahead
    Value
    2.39
    Price
    4.5m
    Own
    0.8%
    3.0
    1. NEW (H)
    2. TOT (A)
    3. FUL (H)
    4. SUN (H)
    5. EVE (A)
  4. Ranked 4 Matt Grimes
    MID COV vs
    10.5 Ahead
    Value
    2.15
    Price
    4.9m
    Own
    0.1%
    3.0
    1. NEW (H)
    2. TOT (A)
    3. FUL (H)
    4. SUN (H)
    5. EVE (A)
  5. Ranked 5 Jack Rudoni
    MID COV vs
    9.5 Ahead
    Value
    1.94
    Price
    4.9m
    Own
    0.1%
    3.0
    1. NEW (H)
    2. TOT (A)
    3. FUL (H)
    4. SUN (H)
    5. EVE (A)
Position
Minutes played
Rounds ahead
Price
1 Bobby Thomas 13.6
DEF vs COV · 4.0m 92%
Value
3.40
Pts
4.4
xGI
0.16
Own
8.5%
Mins
437
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
2 Jay Dasilva 11.0
DEF vs COV · 4.0m 92%
Value
2.75
Pts
3.7
xGI
0.21
Own
0.7%
Mins
444
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
GKP vs COV · 4.5m 92%
Value
2.39
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.00
Own
0.8%
Mins
450
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
4 Matt Grimes 10.5
MID vs COV · 4.9m 92%
Value
2.15
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.05
Own
0.1%
Mins
443
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
5 Jack Rudoni 9.5
MID vs COV · 4.9m 75%
Value
1.94
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.62
Own
0.1%
Mins
297
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
6 Frank Onyeka 8.5
MID vs COV · 4.9m 75%
Value
1.73
Pts
2.7
xGI
0.02
Own
0.1%
Mins
314
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
DEF vs COV · 4.5m 58%
Value
1.76
Pts
2.6
xGI
0.04
Own
0.1%
Mins
282
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
MID vs COV · 4.8m 58%
Value
1.41
Pts
2.1
xGI
0.06
Own
0.1%
Mins
265
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
FWD vs COV · 5.0m 42%
Value
1.28
Pts
2.1
xGI
0.15
Own
0.8%
Mins
227
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
10 Milan van Ewijk ! 6.1
DEF vs COV · 4.0m 56%
Value
1.51
Pts
2.0
xGI
0.08
Own
8.7%
Mins
360
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
MID vs COV · 5.3m 75%
Value
1.13
Pts
1.9
xGI
0.25
Own
0.1%
Mins
231
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
12 Loum Tchaouna 5.5
MID vs COV · 5.4m 42%
Value
1.02
Pts
1.8
xGI
0.18
Own
0.1%
Mins
211
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
13 Stephen Mfuni 5.3
DEF vs COV · 4.0m 50%
Value
1.33
Pts
1.8
xGI
0.01
Own
0.1%
Mins
90
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
14 Ellis Simms 4.8
FWD vs COV · 4.9m 25%
Value
0.97
Pts
1.5
xGI
0.27
Own
0.6%
Mins
104
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
15 Yann Gboho 3.3
MID vs COV · 5.5m 17%
Value
0.59
Pts
1.0
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
0
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
16 Sidiki Cherif 2.8
FWD vs COV · 5.0m 8.3%
Value
0.57
Pts
0.9
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
30
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
17 George Shepherd 2.4
MID vs COV · 4.4m 8.3%
Value
0.55
Pts
0.8
xGI
0.00
Own
0.3%
Mins
0
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
18 Gustavo Hamer 2.4
MID vs COV · 5.4m 8.3%
Value
0.45
Pts
0.8
xGI
0.06
Own
0.1%
Mins
32
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
MID vs COV · 4.8m 8.3%
Value
0.51
Pts
0.8
xGI
0.12
Own
0.1%
Mins
31
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
20 Victor Torp 2.4
MID vs COV · 5.3m 8.3%
Value
0.46
Pts
0.8
xGI
0.20
Own
0.1%
Mins
53
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
21 Dan Bentley 2.1
GKP vs COV · 4.0m 10%
Value
0.53
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.00
Own
0.6%
Mins
0
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
22 Ben Wilson 1.9
GKP vs COV · 4.4m 8.3%
Value
0.44
Pts
0.6
xGI
0.00
Own
0.4%
Mins
0
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
23 Jake Bidwell 1.8
DEF vs COV · 4.0m 8.3%
Value
0.44
Pts
0.6
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
0
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
24 Joel Latibeaudiere 1.8
DEF vs COV · 4.0m 8.3%
Value
0.44
Pts
0.6
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
1
  1. NEW (H)
  2. TOT (A)
  3. FUL (H)
  4. SUN (H)
  5. EVE (A)
each row's Ahead, drawn to scale every bar on one axis of 0 to 20

What this board is, and what it is not

Every ranking here is in expected points or in the weighted score for the rounds ahead, which are the units this model is measured in. The value column is those figures restated over a price — it is a way of scanning the board, and nothing on this site backtests it.

Bonus points are projected nowhere on this site, so they are in none of these figures.

The window score is points times weight rather than points. The 5 weights sum to 3.36, so a window score is never a total anybody could add up from the per-round figures beside it.

The price is what he costs today. What the game would pay for a player who has risen is less, so a value figure is an estimate of a purchase rather than of a sale.

The board is every player the game would let you field, the flagged included — whether a doubtful player is worth picking is a judgement the projection makes with his published chance of playing, not one made by hiding him.

What is measured here, and what is not

  • Measured The projected points

    Replayed against gameweek 2 after it was played: an average miss of 1.617 points a player, against 1.842 for “predict what he has averaged so far”, over 456 players. Recorded Sunday, 6 September 2026 and refreshed by hand, so the date is part of the claim.