xgEdge

Fantasy Premier League

Best value in the game

Every player the game would let you field, projected over the rounds ahead and priced against them. The board is ranked on the model's own currency; the value column is one click away.

Best value in the game

Chris Richards

DEF · CRY · 4.9m · owned by 0.6%

2.46

Value

every bar on one axis of 0 to 2.5

That is 12.0 projected points over the rounds ahead, weighted so the round in front of him counts for most.

Gameweek 6 · 5-round window · feed of 01/10 11:39

Chris Richards is the best value on the board: 2.46 points per million, from 12.0 over 5 rounds at 4.9m.

Price

4.9m

What the game charges for him today, which is what the value column divides by.

Ahead

12.0

His weighted score over the next 5 rounds, and the currency this board is ranked in.

Own

0.6%

The share of managers already holding him.

The top five on this board

The board as your controls leave it — the same five that open the table below.

  1. Ranked 1 Chris Richards
    DEF CRY vs
    12.0 Ahead
    Value
    2.46
    Price
    4.9m
    Own
    0.6%
    3.0
    1. NFO (H)
    2. BHA (A)
    3. NEW (H)
    4. TOT (A)
    5. LIV (H)
  2. Ranked 2 Tyrick Mitchell
    DEF CRY vs
    10.8 Ahead
    Value
    2.40
    Price
    4.5m
    Own
    6.1%
    3.0
    1. NFO (H)
    2. BHA (A)
    3. NEW (H)
    4. TOT (A)
    5. LIV (H)
  3. Ranked 3 Adam Wharton
    MID CRY vs
    10.6 Ahead
    Value
    1.96
    Price
    5.4m
    Own
    0.7%
    3.0
    1. NFO (H)
    2. BHA (A)
    3. NEW (H)
    4. TOT (A)
    5. LIV (H)
  4. Ranked 4 Quinten Timber
    MID CRY vs
    10.6 Ahead
    Value
    2.12
    Price
    5.0m
    Own
    0.0%
    3.0
    1. NFO (H)
    2. BHA (A)
    3. NEW (H)
    4. TOT (A)
    5. LIV (H)
  5. Ranked 5 Daichi Kamada
    MID CRY vs
    10.6 Ahead
    Value
    2.12
    Price
    5.0m
    Own
    0.5%
    3.0
    1. NFO (H)
    2. BHA (A)
    3. NEW (H)
    4. TOT (A)
    5. LIV (H)
Position
Minutes played
Rounds ahead
Price
DEF vs CRY · 4.9m 92%
Value
2.46
Pts
3.8
xGI
0.03
Own
0.6%
Mins
450
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
DEF vs CRY · 4.5m 92%
Value
2.40
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.23
Own
6.1%
Mins
419
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
3 Adam Wharton 10.6
MID vs CRY · 5.4m 92%
Value
1.96
Pts
3.2
xGI
0.15
Own
0.7%
Mins
436
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
4 Quinten Timber 10.6
MID vs CRY · 5.0m 88%
Value
2.12
Pts
3.2
xGI
0.11
Own
0.0%
Mins
253
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
5 Daichi Kamada 10.6
MID vs CRY · 5.0m 92%
Value
2.12
Pts
3.2
xGI
0.18
Own
0.5%
Mins
441
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
DEF vs CRY · 5.0m 75%
Value
1.96
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.31
Own
0.3%
Mins
379
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
DEF vs CRY · 4.8m 75%
Value
1.75
Pts
2.7
xGI
0.04
Own
0.2%
Mins
360
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
FWD vs CRY · 6.0m 58%
Value
1.36
Pts
2.5
xGI
0.19
Own
0.7%
Mins
298
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
MID vs CRY · 5.5m 75%
Value
1.39
Pts
2.3
xGI
0.31
Own
0.3%
Mins
307
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
10 Eddie Nketiah 6.5
FWD vs CRY · 5.5m 58%
Value
1.17
Pts
2.0
xGI
0.88
Own
0.5%
Mins
175
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
11 Walter Benítez 5.1
GKP vs CRY · 4.5m 42%
Value
1.13
Pts
1.6
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
180
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
12 Honest Ahanor 4.0
DEF vs CRY · 4.5m 38%
Value
0.90
Pts
1.3
xGI
0.01
Own
0.0%
Mins
90
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
13 Dwight McNeil 3.9
MID vs CRY · 5.4m 25%
Value
0.72
Pts
1.2
xGI
0.07
Own
0.1%
Mins
84
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
DEF vs CRY · 4.4m 31%
Value
0.75
Pts
1.1
xGI
0.01
Own
0.3%
Mins
189
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
15 Darío Osorio 2.8
MID vs CRY · 5.5m 13%
Value
0.51
Pts
0.8
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
1
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
16 Cheick Doucouré 2.4
MID vs CRY · 4.8m 8.3%
Value
0.50
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
0
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
17 Joél Drakes-Thomas 2.4
MID vs CRY · 4.5m 8.3%
Value
0.54
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
0
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
MID vs CRY · 5.4m 8.3%
Value
0.44
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.10
Own
0.0%
Mins
54
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
19 Ismaïla Sarr 2.4
MID vs CRY · 6.2m 8.3%
Value
0.39
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.11
Own
0.6%
Mins
8
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
20 Jefferson Lerma Solís 2.4
MID vs CRY · 4.8m 8.3%
Value
0.50
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.46
Own
0.1%
Mins
51
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
21 Will Hughes 2.4
MID vs CRY · 4.4m 8.3%
Value
0.54
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.12
Own
7.3%
Mins
29
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
22 Zavier Gozo 2.4
MID vs CRY · 4.9m 8.3%
Value
0.49
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
28
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
23 Ben Chilwell 2.1
DEF vs CRY · 4.5m 13%
Value
0.46
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.87
Own
0.4%
Mins
29
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
24 Remi Matthews 1.9
GKP vs CRY · 4.0m 8.3%
Value
0.48
Pts
0.6
xGI
0.00
Own
1.7%
Mins
0
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
DEF vs CRY · 4.4m 8.3%
Value
0.37
Pts
0.5
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
16
  1. NFO (H)
  2. BHA (A)
  3. NEW (H)
  4. TOT (A)
  5. LIV (H)
each row's Ahead, drawn to scale every bar on one axis of 0 to 20

What this board is, and what it is not

Every ranking here is in expected points or in the weighted score for the rounds ahead, which are the units this model is measured in. The value column is those figures restated over a price — it is a way of scanning the board, and nothing on this site backtests it.

Bonus points are projected nowhere on this site, so they are in none of these figures.

The window score is points times weight rather than points. The 5 weights sum to 3.36, so a window score is never a total anybody could add up from the per-round figures beside it.

The price is what he costs today. What the game would pay for a player who has risen is less, so a value figure is an estimate of a purchase rather than of a sale.

The board is every player the game would let you field, the flagged included — whether a doubtful player is worth picking is a judgement the projection makes with his published chance of playing, not one made by hiding him.

What is measured here, and what is not

  • Measured The projected points

    Replayed against gameweek 2 after it was played: an average miss of 1.617 points a player, against 1.842 for “predict what he has averaged so far”, over 456 players. Recorded Sunday, 6 September 2026 and refreshed by hand, so the date is part of the claim.