Fantasy Premier League

Best value in the game

Every player the game would let you field, projected over the rounds ahead and priced against them. The board is ranked on the model's own currency; the value column is one click away.

Thierno Barry

FWD · EVE · 5.7m · owned by 8.3%

2.41

Value

every bar on one axis of 0 to 2.5

That is 13.7 projected points over the rounds ahead, weighted so the round in front of him counts for most.

Gameweek 6 · 5-round window · feed of 01/10 11:39

Thierno Barry is the best value on the board: 2.41 points per million, from 13.7 over 5 rounds at 5.7m.

Price

5.7m

What the game charges for him today, which is what the value column divides by.

Ahead

13.7

His weighted score over the next 5 rounds, and the currency this board is ranked in.

Own

8.3%

The share of managers already holding him.

The top five on this board

The board as your controls leave it — the same five that open the table below.

Ranked 1 Thierno Barry

FWD EVE vs

13.7 Ahead

Value

2.41

Price

5.7m

Own

8.3%
3.0
1. HUL (A)
2. CHE (H)
3. ARS (A)
4. !
5. COV (H)
Ranked 2 James Tarkowski

DEF EVE vs

13.1 Ahead

Value

2.11

Price

6.2m

Own

17%
3.0
1. HUL (A)
2. CHE (H)
3. ARS (A)
4. !
5. COV (H)
Ranked 3 Jarrad Branthwaite

DEF EVE vs

12.0 Ahead

Value

2.19

Price

5.5m

Own

2.4%
3.0
1. HUL (A)
2. CHE (H)
3. ARS (A)
4. !
5. COV (H)
Ranked 4 Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall

MID EVE vs

12.0 Ahead

Value

1.81

Price

6.6m

Own

6.0%
3.0
1. HUL (A)
2. CHE (H)
3. ARS (A)
4. !
5. COV (H)
Ranked 5 Jordan Pickford

GKP EVE vs

11.1 Ahead

Value

2.01

Price

5.5m

Own

9.1%
3.0
1. HUL (A)
2. CHE (H)
3. ARS (A)
4. !
5. COV (H)

Position

All GKP DEF MID FWD

Minutes played

Any 90+ 270+ 450+ 900+

At least

Any Very safe Safe Rotation risk

Rounds ahead

3 rounds 5 rounds 8 rounds

Price

Enter your squad to mark what you already own and what you could afford →

Showing 20 of 20 players 20 of 487 match your filters Clear filters

Player Price Pts Ahead Value xGI Own Start Mins Next fixtures

1 Thierno Barry FWD vs EVE 5.7m 4.0 13.7 2.41 0.79 8.3% 92% 417

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

1 Thierno Barry 13.7

FWD vs EVE · 5.7m 92%

Value: 2.41
Pts: 4.0
xGI: 0.79
Own: 8.3%
Mins: 417

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

2 James Tarkowski DEF vs EVE 6.2m 3.9 13.1 2.11 0.05 17% 92% 450

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

2 James Tarkowski 13.1

DEF vs EVE · 6.2m 92%

Value: 2.11
Pts: 3.9
xGI: 0.05
Own: 17%
Mins: 450

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

3 Jarrad Branthwaite DEF vs EVE 5.5m 3.6 12.0 2.19 0.03 2.4% 92% 450

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

3 Jarrad Branthwaite 12.0

DEF vs EVE · 5.5m 92%

Value: 2.19
Pts: 3.6
xGI: 0.03
Own: 2.4%
Mins: 450

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

4 Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall MID vs EVE 6.6m 3.5 12.0 1.81 0.37 6.0% 92% 450

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

4 Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall 12.0

MID vs EVE · 6.6m 92%

Value: 1.81
Pts: 3.5
xGI: 0.37
Own: 6.0%
Mins: 450

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

5 Jordan Pickford GKP vs EVE 5.5m 3.3 11.1 2.01 0.00 9.1% 92% 450

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

5 Jordan Pickford 11.1

GKP vs EVE · 5.5m 92%

Value: 2.01
Pts: 3.3
xGI: 0.00
Own: 9.1%
Mins: 450

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

6 Vitalii Mykolenko DEF vs EVE 4.6m 3.1 10.5 2.27 0.04 4.2% 92% 450

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

6 Vitalii Mykolenko 10.5

DEF vs EVE · 4.6m 92%

Value: 2.27
Pts: 3.1
xGI: 0.04
Own: 4.2%
Mins: 450

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

7 Harrison Armstrong MID vs EVE 5.0m 3.0 10.0 2.00 0.14 0.4% 92% 446

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

7 Harrison Armstrong 10.0

MID vs EVE · 5.0m 92%

Value: 2.00
Pts: 3.0
xGI: 0.14
Own: 0.4%
Mins: 446

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

8 Tyrique George MID vs EVE 5.5m 2.6 8.7 1.59 0.19 0.9% 75% 309

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

8 Tyrique George 8.7

MID vs EVE · 5.5m 75%

Value: 1.59
Pts: 2.6
xGI: 0.19
Own: 0.9%
Mins: 309

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

9 James Garner MID vs EVE 6.0m 2.5 8.5 1.42 0.10 0.2% 75% 328

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

9 James Garner 8.5

MID vs EVE · 6.0m 75%

Value: 1.42
Pts: 2.5
xGI: 0.10
Own: 0.2%
Mins: 328

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

10 Brennan Johnson MID vs EVE 5.9m 2.1 7.0 1.19 0.47 0.1% 58% 238

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

10 Brennan Johnson 7.0

MID vs EVE · 5.9m 58%

Value: 1.19
Pts: 2.1
xGI: 0.47
Own: 0.1%
Mins: 238

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

11 Ainsley Maitland-Niles DEF vs EVE 4.5m 1.9 6.4 1.43 0.16 1.4% 63% 177

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

11 Ainsley Maitland-Niles 6.4

DEF vs EVE · 4.5m 63%

Value: 1.43
Pts: 1.9
xGI: 0.16
Own: 1.4%
Mins: 177

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

12 Jack Grealish MID vs EVE 6.5m 1.1 3.8 0.59 0.30 0.5% 25% 135

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

12 Jack Grealish 3.8

MID vs EVE · 6.5m 25%

Value: 0.59
Pts: 1.1
xGI: 0.30
Own: 0.5%
Mins: 135

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

13 Hayden Hackney MID vs EVE 5.4m 1.1 3.8 0.70 0.12 0.2% 25% 137

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

13 Hayden Hackney 3.8

MID vs EVE · 5.4m 25%

Value: 0.70
Pts: 1.1
xGI: 0.12
Own: 0.2%
Mins: 137

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

14 Braiden Graham MID vs EVE 4.5m 0.8 2.7 0.61 0.00 0.1% 13% 0

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

14 Braiden Graham 2.7

MID vs EVE · 4.5m 13%

Value: 0.61
Pts: 0.8
xGI: 0.00
Own: 0.1%
Mins: 0

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

15 Tyler Dibling MID vs EVE 5.4m 0.7 2.4 0.44 1.24 0.0% 8.3% 24

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

15 Tyler Dibling 2.4

MID vs EVE · 5.4m 8.3%

Value: 0.44
Pts: 0.7
xGI: 1.24
Own: 0.0%
Mins: 24

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

16 Carlos Alcaraz Durán MID vs EVE 4.9m 0.7 2.3 0.47 1.26 0.1% 8.3% 5

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

16 Carlos Alcaraz Durán 2.3

MID vs EVE · 4.9m 8.3%

Value: 0.47
Pts: 0.7
xGI: 1.26
Own: 0.1%
Mins: 5

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

17 Mark Travers GKP vs EVE 5.0m 0.6 2.0 0.39 0.00 0.0% 8.3% 0

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

17 Mark Travers 2.0

GKP vs EVE · 5.0m 8.3%

Value: 0.39
Pts: 0.6
xGI: 0.00
Own: 0.0%
Mins: 0

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

18 Tom King GKP vs EVE 4.5m 0.6 2.0 0.44 0.00 0.0% 8.3% 0

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

18 Tom King 2.0

GKP vs EVE · 4.5m 8.3%

Value: 0.44
Pts: 0.6
xGI: 0.00
Own: 0.0%
Mins: 0

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

19 Michael Keane DEF vs EVE 4.8m 0.5 1.7 0.35 0.00 0.7% 8.3% 0

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

19 Michael Keane 1.7

DEF vs EVE · 4.8m 8.3%

Value: 0.35
Pts: 0.5
xGI: 0.00
Own: 0.7%
Mins: 0

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

20 Jake O'Brien DEF vs EVE 4.8m 0.5 1.7 0.35 0.00 0.3% 8.3% 16

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

20 Jake O'Brien 1.7

DEF vs EVE · 4.8m 8.3%

Value: 0.35
Pts: 0.5
xGI: 0.00
Own: 0.3%
Mins: 16

HUL (A)
CHE (H)
ARS (A)
!
COV (H)

each row's Ahead, drawn to scale every bar on one axis of 0 to 20

What this board is, and what it is not

Every ranking here is in expected points or in the weighted score for the rounds ahead, which are the units this model is measured in. The value column is those figures restated over a price — it is a way of scanning the board, and nothing on this site backtests it.

Bonus points are projected nowhere on this site, so they are in none of these figures.

The window score is points times weight rather than points. The 5 weights sum to 3.36, so a window score is never a total anybody could add up from the per-round figures beside it.

The price is what he costs today. What the game would pay for a player who has risen is less, so a value figure is an estimate of a purchase rather than of a sale.

The board is every player the game would let you field, the flagged included — whether a doubtful player is worth picking is a judgement the projection makes with his published chance of playing, not one made by hiding him.

What is measured here, and what is not

Measured The projected points

Replayed against gameweek 2 after it was played: an average miss of 1.617 points a player, against 1.842 for “predict what he has averaged so far”, over 456 players. Recorded Sunday, 6 September 2026 and refreshed by hand, so the date is part of the claim.