xgEdge

Fantasy Premier League

Best value in the game

Every player the game would let you field, projected over the rounds ahead and priced against them. The board is ranked on the model's own currency; the value column is one click away.

Best value in the game

John Egan

DEF · HUL · 4.1m · owned by 7.0%

3.13

Value

every bar on one axis of 0 to 5.0

That is 12.8 projected points over the rounds ahead, weighted so the round in front of him counts for most.

Gameweek 6 · 5-round window · feed of 01/10 11:39

John Egan is the best value on the board: 3.13 points per million, from 12.8 over 5 rounds at 4.1m.

Price

4.1m

What the game charges for him today, which is what the value column divides by.

Ahead

12.8

His weighted score over the next 5 rounds, and the currency this board is ranked in.

Own

7.0%

The share of managers already holding him.

The top five on this board

The board as your controls leave it — the same five that open the table below.

  1. Ranked 1 John Egan
    DEF HUL vs
    12.8 Ahead
    Value
    3.13
    Price
    4.1m
    Own
    7.0%
    3.2
    1. EVE (H)
    2. FUL (A)
    3. BRE (H)
    4. IPS (H)
    5. ARS (A)
  2. GKP HUL vs
    12.5 Ahead
    Value
    2.65
    Price
    4.7m
    Own
    13%
    3.2
    1. EVE (H)
    2. FUL (A)
    3. BRE (H)
    4. IPS (H)
    5. ARS (A)
  3. Ranked 3 Oli McBurnie
    FWD HUL vs
    11.7 Ahead
    Value
    2.13
    Price
    5.5m
    Own
    1.9%
    3.2
    1. EVE (H)
    2. FUL (A)
    3. BRE (H)
    4. IPS (H)
    5. ARS (A)
  4. Ranked 4 Mohamed Belloumi
    MID HUL vs
    10.6 Ahead
    Value
    2.08
    Price
    5.1m
    Own
    5.1%
    3.2
    1. EVE (H)
    2. FUL (A)
    3. BRE (H)
    4. IPS (H)
    5. ARS (A)
  5. Ranked 5 Semi Ajayi
    DEF HUL vs
    10.4 Ahead
    Value
    2.48
    Price
    4.2m
    Own
    14%
    3.2
    1. EVE (H)
    2. FUL (A)
    3. BRE (H)
    4. IPS (H)
    5. ARS (A)
Position
Minutes played
Rounds ahead
Price
1 John Egan 12.8
DEF vs HUL · 4.1m 92%
Value
3.13
Pts
4.0
xGI
0.01
Own
7.0%
Mins
437
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
GKP vs HUL · 4.7m 92%
Value
2.65
Pts
3.8
xGI
0.00
Own
13%
Mins
450
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
3 Oli McBurnie 11.7
FWD vs HUL · 5.5m 92%
Value
2.13
Pts
3.6
xGI
0.28
Own
1.9%
Mins
441
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
MID vs HUL · 5.1m 92%
Value
2.08
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.26
Own
5.1%
Mins
394
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
5 Semi Ajayi 10.4
DEF vs HUL · 4.2m 92%
Value
2.48
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.14
Own
14%
Mins
423
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
6 Regan Slater 10.3
MID vs HUL · 4.5m 92%
Value
2.29
Pts
3.2
xGI
0.16
Own
5.2%
Mins
437
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
7 Ryan Giles 9.6
DEF vs HUL · 4.0m 92%
Value
2.41
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.09
Own
2.9%
Mins
444
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
8 Lewie Coyle 7.6
DEF vs HUL · 4.0m 92%
Value
1.90
Pts
2.4
xGI
0.05
Own
0.7%
Mins
348
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
MID vs HUL · 5.0m 75%
Value
1.25
Pts
1.9
xGI
0.04
Own
0.1%
Mins
249
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
10 Nobel Mendy 6.3
DEF vs HUL · 4.1m 75%
Value
1.52
Pts
2.0
xGI
0.12
Own
6.3%
Mins
249
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
11 Matt Crooks 5.5
MID vs HUL · 4.4m 58%
Value
1.26
Pts
1.7
xGI
0.05
Own
0.5%
Mins
203
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
12 Sorba Thomas 5.1
MID vs HUL · 5.5m 38%
Value
0.93
Pts
1.6
xGI
0.24
Own
0.0%
Mins
119
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
MID vs HUL · 5.0m 25%
Value
0.75
Pts
1.2
xGI
0.04
Own
0.0%
Mins
138
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
14 Robinio Vaz 3.3
FWD vs HUL · 5.0m 13%
Value
0.66
Pts
1.0
xGI
0.04
Own
0.1%
Mins
20
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
DEF vs HUL · 4.0m 25%
Value
0.75
Pts
1.0
xGI
0.03
Own
0.6%
Mins
197
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
16 Christos Mouzakitis 2.8
MID vs HUL · 5.0m 13%
Value
0.56
Pts
0.9
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
0
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
MID vs HUL · 5.0m 10%
Value
0.55
Pts
0.8
xGI
1.44
Own
0.0%
Mins
72
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
18 Joe Gelhardt 2.4
MID vs HUL · 5.0m 8.3%
Value
0.48
Pts
0.7
xGI
1.55
Own
0.0%
Mins
7
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
19 Abdülkadir Ömür 2.4
MID vs HUL · 4.9m 8.3%
Value
0.49
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
0
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
20 Kieran Dowell 2.4
MID vs HUL · 4.5m 8.3%
Value
0.54
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.00
Own
0.3%
Mins
0
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
21 Óscar Zambrano 2.4
MID vs HUL · 4.5m 8.3%
Value
0.54
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
0
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
22 Jens Hjertø-Dahl 2.4
MID vs HUL · 4.9m 8.3%
Value
0.49
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
8
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
23 Tim Iroegbunam 2.4
MID vs HUL · 5.0m 8.3%
Value
0.47
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.16
Own
0.0%
Mins
70
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
24 Dillon Phillips 1.9
GKP vs HUL · 4.0m 8.3%
Value
0.49
Pts
0.6
xGI
0.00
Own
1.4%
Mins
0
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
25 Cathal McCarthy 1.7
DEF vs HUL · 4.0m 8.3%
Value
0.42
Pts
0.5
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
0
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
26 Paddy McNair 1.7
DEF vs HUL · 4.0m 8.3%
Value
0.42
Pts
0.5
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
26
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
27 Brooke Norton-Cuffy ! 1.5
DEF vs HUL · 4.0m 9.4%
Value
0.38
Pts
0.5
xGI
0.13
Own
0.2%
Mins
34
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
28 Matt Targett ! 1.3
DEF vs HUL · 4.0m 6.3%
Value
0.32
Pts
0.4
xGI
0.00
Own
1.6%
Mins
5
  1. EVE (H)
  2. FUL (A)
  3. BRE (H)
  4. IPS (H)
  5. ARS (A)
each row's Ahead, drawn to scale every bar on one axis of 0 to 20

What this board is, and what it is not

Every ranking here is in expected points or in the weighted score for the rounds ahead, which are the units this model is measured in. The value column is those figures restated over a price — it is a way of scanning the board, and nothing on this site backtests it.

Bonus points are projected nowhere on this site, so they are in none of these figures.

The window score is points times weight rather than points. The 5 weights sum to 3.36, so a window score is never a total anybody could add up from the per-round figures beside it.

The price is what he costs today. What the game would pay for a player who has risen is less, so a value figure is an estimate of a purchase rather than of a sale.

The board is every player the game would let you field, the flagged included — whether a doubtful player is worth picking is a judgement the projection makes with his published chance of playing, not one made by hiding him.

What is measured here, and what is not

  • Measured The projected points

    Replayed against gameweek 2 after it was played: an average miss of 1.617 points a player, against 1.842 for “predict what he has averaged so far”, over 456 players. Recorded Sunday, 6 September 2026 and refreshed by hand, so the date is part of the claim.