xgEdge

Fantasy Premier League

Best value in the game

Every player the game would let you field, projected over the rounds ahead and priced against them. The board is ranked on the model's own currency; the value column is one click away.

Best value in the game

James Trafford

GKP · LEE · 5.0m · owned by 5.5%

2.54

Value

every bar on one axis of 0 to 5.0

That is 12.7 projected points over the rounds ahead, weighted so the round in front of him counts for most.

Gameweek 6 · 5-round window · feed of 01/10 11:39

James Trafford is the best value on the board: 2.54 points per million, from 12.7 over 5 rounds at 5.0m.

Price

5.0m

What the game charges for him today, which is what the value column divides by.

Ahead

12.7

His weighted score over the next 5 rounds, and the currency this board is ranked in.

Own

5.5%

The share of managers already holding him.

The top five on this board

The board as your controls leave it — the same five that open the table below.

  1. Ranked 1 Anton Stach
    MID LEE vs
    13.4 Ahead
    Value
    2.24
    Price
    6.0m
    Own
    2.5%
    3.6
    1. ARS (A)
    2. MUN (H)
    3. SUN (A)
    4. BOU (A)
    5. TOT (H)
  2. Ranked 2 James Trafford
    GKP LEE vs
    12.7 Ahead
    Value
    2.54
    Price
    5.0m
    Own
    5.5%
    3.6
    1. ARS (A)
    2. MUN (H)
    3. SUN (A)
    4. BOU (A)
    5. TOT (H)
  3. Ranked 3 Dominic Calvert-Lewin
    FWD LEE vs
    12.6 Ahead
    Value
    2.10
    Price
    6.0m
    Own
    25%
    3.6
    1. ARS (A)
    2. MUN (H)
    3. SUN (A)
    4. BOU (A)
    5. TOT (H)
  4. Ranked 4 Tarik Muharemović
    DEF LEE vs
    12.5 Ahead
    Value
    2.50
    Price
    5.0m
    Own
    4.3%
    3.6
    1. ARS (A)
    2. MUN (H)
    3. SUN (A)
    4. BOU (A)
    5. TOT (H)
  5. Ranked 5 Ethan Ampadu
    MID LEE vs
    11.9 Ahead
    Value
    2.20
    Price
    5.4m
    Own
    0.9%
    3.6
    1. ARS (A)
    2. MUN (H)
    3. SUN (A)
    4. BOU (A)
    5. TOT (H)
Position
All GKP DEF MID FWD
Minutes played
Any 90+ 270+ 450+ 900+
At least
Any Very safe Safe Rotation risk
Rounds ahead
3 rounds 5 rounds 8 rounds
Price
Enter your squad to mark what you already own and what you could afford →
Showing 23 of 23 players 23 of 487 match your filters Clear filters
1 Anton Stach 13.4
MID vs LEE · 6.0m 92%
Value
2.24
Pts
3.7
xGI
0.26
Own
2.5%
Mins
447
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
2 James Trafford 12.7
GKP vs LEE · 5.0m 92%
Value
2.54
Pts
3.7
xGI
0.00
Own
5.5%
Mins
450
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
3 Dominic Calvert-Lewin 12.6
FWD vs LEE · 6.0m 92%
Value
2.10
Pts
3.3
xGI
0.66
Own
25%
Mins
419
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
4 Tarik Muharemović 12.5
DEF vs LEE · 5.0m 92%
Value
2.50
Pts
3.5
xGI
0.11
Own
4.3%
Mins
450
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
5 Ethan Ampadu 11.9
MID vs LEE · 5.4m 92%
Value
2.20
Pts
3.4
xGI
0.07
Own
0.9%
Mins
450
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
6 James Justin 11.4
DEF vs LEE · 4.5m 92%
Value
2.53
Pts
3.2
xGI
0.12
Own
1.4%
Mins
450
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
7 Jayden Bogle 10.1
DEF vs LEE · 4.6m 92%
Value
2.19
Pts
2.8
xGI
0.36
Own
7.2%
Mins
365
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
8 Noah Okafor 7.9
MID vs LEE · 5.8m 75%
Value
1.37
Pts
2.2
xGI
0.13
Own
0.4%
Mins
299
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
9 Tanaka Ao 6.6
MID vs LEE · 4.9m 58%
Value
1.35
Pts
1.8
xGI
0.28
Own
0.3%
Mins
255
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
10 Nico Elvedi 6.1
DEF vs LEE · 4.5m 58%
Value
1.36
Pts
1.7
xGI
0.19
Own
0.1%
Mins
326
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
11 Gabriel Gudmundsson 5.7
DEF vs LEE · 4.5m 58%
Value
1.27
Pts
1.6
xGI
0.08
Own
0.1%
Mins
252
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
12 Brenden Aaronson 5.0
MID vs LEE · 5.3m 42%
Value
0.94
Pts
1.4
xGI
0.01
Own
0.5%
Mins
194
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
13 Jaka Bijol 4.4
DEF vs LEE · 5.0m 42%
Value
0.87
Pts
1.2
xGI
0.06
Own
0.7%
Mins
164
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
14 Jean-Mattéo Bahoya 2.7
MID vs LEE · 5.0m 13%
Value
0.53
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
1
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
15 Lukas Nmecha 2.6
FWD vs LEE · 5.4m 8.3%
Value
0.49
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.59
Own
0.5%
Mins
64
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
16 Daniel James 2.3
MID vs LEE · 4.9m 8.3%
Value
0.47
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.63
Own
0.1%
Mins
52
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
17 Alfie Cresswell 2.3
MID vs LEE · 4.5m 8.3%
Value
0.51
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
0
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
18 Ilia Gruev 2.3
MID vs LEE · 5.0m 8.3%
Value
0.46
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
0
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
19 Sean Longstaff 2.3
MID vs LEE · 4.9m 8.3%
Value
0.47
Pts
0.6
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
10
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
20 Michael Zetterer 2.3
GKP vs LEE · 4.0m 13%
Value
0.57
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.00
Own
0.7%
Mins
0
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
21 Alex Cairns 2.0
GKP vs LEE · 4.0m 10%
Value
0.51
Pts
0.6
xGI
0.00
Own
0.2%
Mins
0
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
22 Melvin Bard 1.8
DEF vs LEE · 4.5m 13%
Value
0.40
Pts
0.5
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
18
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
23 Jayden Lienou 1.5
DEF vs LEE · 4.0m 8.3%
Value
0.38
Pts
0.4
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
0
  1. ARS (A)
  2. MUN (H)
  3. SUN (A)
  4. BOU (A)
  5. TOT (H)
each row's Ahead, drawn to scale every bar on one axis of 0 to 20

What this board is, and what it is not

Every ranking here is in expected points or in the weighted score for the rounds ahead, which are the units this model is measured in. The value column is those figures restated over a price — it is a way of scanning the board, and nothing on this site backtests it.

Bonus points are projected nowhere on this site, so they are in none of these figures.

The window score is points times weight rather than points. The 5 weights sum to 3.36, so a window score is never a total anybody could add up from the per-round figures beside it.

The price is what he costs today. What the game would pay for a player who has risen is less, so a value figure is an estimate of a purchase rather than of a sale.

The board is every player the game would let you field, the flagged included — whether a doubtful player is worth picking is a judgement the projection makes with his published chance of playing, not one made by hiding him.

What is measured here, and what is not

  • Measured The projected points

    Replayed against gameweek 2 after it was played: an average miss of 1.617 points a player, against 1.842 for “predict what he has averaged so far”, over 456 players. Recorded Sunday, 6 September 2026 and refreshed by hand, so the date is part of the claim.

Mind if we count your visit?

We use Google Analytics only to see how many people visit and which pages they read. It loads after you allow it — no ads, no tracking across other sites. What we collect