xgEdge

Fantasy Premier League

Best value in the game

Every player the game would let you field, projected over the rounds ahead and priced against them. The board is ranked on the model's own currency; the value column is one click away.

Best value in the game

Bart Verbruggen

GKP · BHA · 4.5m · owned by 22%

2.37

Value

every bar on one axis of 0 to 2.5

That is 10.7 projected points over the rounds ahead, weighted so the round in front of him counts for most.

Gameweek 6 · 5-round window · feed of 01/10 11:39

Bart Verbruggen is the best value on the board: 2.37 points per million, from 10.7 over 5 rounds at 4.5m.

Price

4.5m

What the game charges for him today, which is what the value column divides by.

Ahead

10.7

His weighted score over the next 5 rounds, and the currency this board is ranked in.

Own

22%

The share of managers already holding him.

The top five on this board

The board as your controls leave it — the same five that open the table below.

  1. Ranked 1 Pascal Groß
    MID BHA vs
    13.3 Ahead
    Value
    2.29
    Price
    5.8m
    Own
    29%
    2.6
    1. SUN (A)
    2. CRY (H)
    3. LIV (A)
    4. MCI (A)
    5. BRE (H)
  2. Ranked 2 Maxim De Cuyper
    DEF BHA vs
    11.2 Ahead
    Value
    2.25
    Price
    5.0m
    Own
    28%
    2.6
    1. SUN (A)
    2. CRY (H)
    3. LIV (A)
    4. MCI (A)
    5. BRE (H)
  3. Ranked 3 Luka Vušković
    DEF BHA vs
    11.2 Ahead
    Value
    2.24
    Price
    5.0m
    Own
    3.7%
    2.6
    1. SUN (A)
    2. CRY (H)
    3. LIV (A)
    4. MCI (A)
    5. BRE (H)
  4. Ranked 4 Diego Gómez
    MID BHA vs
    11.0 Ahead
    Value
    2.20
    Price
    5.0m
    Own
    4.0%
    2.6
    1. SUN (A)
    2. CRY (H)
    3. LIV (A)
    4. MCI (A)
    5. BRE (H)
  5. Ranked 5 Bart Verbruggen
    GKP BHA vs
    10.7 Ahead
    Value
    2.37
    Price
    4.5m
    Own
    22%
    2.6
    1. SUN (A)
    2. CRY (H)
    3. LIV (A)
    4. MCI (A)
    5. BRE (H)
Position
Minutes played
Rounds ahead
Price
1 Pascal Groß 13.3
MID vs BHA · 5.8m 92%
Value
2.29
Pts
3.8
xGI
0.52
Own
29%
Mins
450
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
DEF vs BHA · 5.0m 92%
Value
2.25
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.47
Own
28%
Mins
423
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
DEF vs BHA · 5.0m 92%
Value
2.24
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.10
Own
3.7%
Mins
437
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
4 Diego Gómez 11.0
MID vs BHA · 5.0m 92%
Value
2.20
Pts
3.2
xGI
0.32
Own
4.0%
Mins
433
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
GKP vs BHA · 4.5m 92%
Value
2.37
Pts
3.1
xGI
0.04
Own
22%
Mins
450
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
FWD vs BHA · 5.6m 75%
Value
1.87
Pts
3.0
xGI
0.36
Own
4.2%
Mins
353
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
DEF vs BHA · 4.5m 92%
Value
2.01
Pts
2.5
xGI
0.12
Own
0.3%
Mins
437
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
8 Yasin Ayari 8.6
MID vs BHA · 5.4m 75%
Value
1.60
Pts
2.5
xGI
0.24
Own
0.4%
Mins
333
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
MID vs BHA · 4.5m 58%
Value
1.77
Pts
2.3
xGI
0.73
Own
4.0%
Mins
236
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
DEF vs BHA · 4.4m 75%
Value
1.63
Pts
2.0
xGI
0.07
Own
1.6%
Mins
332
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
11 Lewis Dunk ! 5.6
DEF vs BHA · 4.5m 56%
Value
1.24
Pts
1.6
xGI
0.03
Own
1.5%
Mins
360
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
12 Chema Andrés 5.2
MID vs BHA · 5.5m 38%
Value
0.95
Pts
1.5
xGI
0.53
Own
0.0%
Mins
109
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
FWD vs BHA · 5.3m 25%
Value
0.87
Pts
1.3
xGI
0.54
Own
0.5%
Mins
104
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
14 Younes Ibrahim 3.1
MID vs BHA · 4.5m 17%
Value
0.70
Pts
0.9
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
0
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
15 Promise David 2.8
FWD vs BHA · 5.9m 8.3%
Value
0.47
Pts
0.8
xGI
1.64
Own
0.2%
Mins
23
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
16 Matt O'Riley 2.4
MID vs BHA · 5.4m 8.3%
Value
0.45
Pts
0.7
xGI
2.61
Own
0.1%
Mins
10
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
17 Nehemiah Oriola 2.4
MID vs BHA · 4.5m 8.3%
Value
0.53
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.00
Own
0.2%
Mins
0
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
18 Ibrahim Osman 2.4
MID vs BHA · 5.0m 8.3%
Value
0.47
Pts
0.7
xGI
0.27
Own
0.0%
Mins
40
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
19 Pascal Struijk ! 2.2
DEF vs BHA · 4.9m 19%
Value
0.44
Pts
0.6
xGI
0.16
Own
0.2%
Mins
98
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
20 Jason Steele 1.9
GKP vs BHA · 4.0m 8.3%
Value
0.47
Pts
0.5
xGI
0.00
Own
4.1%
Mins
0
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
21 Jaouen Hadjam 1.7
DEF vs BHA · 4.5m 10%
Value
0.38
Pts
0.5
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
0
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
22 Diego Coppola 1.6
DEF vs BHA · 4.5m 8.3%
Value
0.35
Pts
0.4
xGI
0.00
Own
0.0%
Mins
0
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
23 Michael Svoboda 1.6
DEF vs BHA · 5.0m 8.3%
Value
0.31
Pts
0.4
xGI
0.00
Own
0.1%
Mins
4
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
24 Costinha 1.6
DEF vs BHA · 4.5m 8.3%
Value
0.35
Pts
0.4
xGI
0.56
Own
0.0%
Mins
68
  1. SUN (A)
  2. CRY (H)
  3. LIV (A)
  4. MCI (A)
  5. BRE (H)
each row's Ahead, drawn to scale every bar on one axis of 0 to 20

What this board is, and what it is not

Every ranking here is in expected points or in the weighted score for the rounds ahead, which are the units this model is measured in. The value column is those figures restated over a price — it is a way of scanning the board, and nothing on this site backtests it.

Bonus points are projected nowhere on this site, so they are in none of these figures.

The window score is points times weight rather than points. The 5 weights sum to 3.36, so a window score is never a total anybody could add up from the per-round figures beside it.

The price is what he costs today. What the game would pay for a player who has risen is less, so a value figure is an estimate of a purchase rather than of a sale.

The board is every player the game would let you field, the flagged included — whether a doubtful player is worth picking is a judgement the projection makes with his published chance of playing, not one made by hiding him.

What is measured here, and what is not

  • Measured The projected points

    Replayed against gameweek 2 after it was played: an average miss of 1.617 points a player, against 1.842 for “predict what he has averaged so far”, over 456 players. Recorded Sunday, 6 September 2026 and refreshed by hand, so the date is part of the claim.