xgEdge

Results

Juventus results 2026/2027

Juventus · Serie A 2026/2027 →

Juventus's recorded results for 2026/2027, newest first, with the available xG behind each score. Compare outcomes with the chances created and conceded, then open a match for more detail.

Showing 2 of 2 matching results

5 played this season

2 available results · Last 5 requested

Reset filters

Results

Wins – draws – losses (W–D–L)
1 win, 0 draws, 1 loss

3 pts 3–3 goals 0 GD

Chances

Provider xG / xGA
3.28 – 1.43
1.64 – 0.72 per match
xGD
+1.85
+0.93 per match
xG record
1 with the chances, 1 with even chances, 0 against them

Small sample: 2 matches.

Comparable xG: 2 of 2 completed results.

Points vs xPts Model

3 pts 4.0 xPts

−1.0 vs xPts

Small sample: 2 matches.

Matched xPts: 2 of 2 selected results.

Model · How xPts works →

Match points use 3 for a win, 1 for a draw and 0 for a loss, before deductions or sanctions.

Points vs xPts uses only matches with available xPts on both sides of the comparison.

What the results say

Last 5 · All competitions · Away

Juventus's mixed record carries recorded xG in only 2 of 2 results, too few to read against the chances.

Points minus xPts, match by match

Over these 2 results Juventus are 1.05 points below their xPts.

Points
3
xPts
4.05
Gap
-1.05
Sun 23/08 Sun 13/09 -2 -1 0 +1 +0.37 -1.05 +0.37 -1.42 Running gap points − xPts Each match points − xPts
Juventus: Points vs xPts, the gap after every selected result
Date Opponent Points xPts Match gap Running gap
Sun 23/08 Frosinone 3 2.63 +0.37 +0.37
Sun 13/09 Sassuolo 0 1.42 -1.42 -1.05

Scores and xG

Juventus first

  • Away Serie A Loss with even chances

    xG 1.10

    xGA 1.02

    xGD +0.08

    2:3 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Sassuolo, Sun 13/09

    The team lost, while the chance difference was approximately even. The outcome was weaker than that difference alone suggests.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    1.41
    Points minus xPts
    -1.41

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away Serie A Win backed by the chances

    xG 2.18

    xGA 0.41

    xGD +1.77

    1:0 Win
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Frosinone, Sun 23/08

    The team won and had a positive xG difference. The chances support the direction of the result, without making a judgment about fairness.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    3
    Post-match model xPts
    2.63
    Points minus xPts
    +0.37

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →

Reading these results

xG is the provider's estimate of chances created; xGA is the opponent's xG. xGD is the difference. Labels compare the recorded outcome with those chances; they are interpretations, not judgments about fairness.

xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

How each figure on this page is read

Every xG bar is drawn on one fixed scale: full width is 7.20 xG, the same on every card and in every window, so two cards can be compared by eye. A rarer match above that is capped with a hatched end, and the figure beside the bar still gives its value.

An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

Goal difference minus xGD says how far a scoreline finished from the chances behind it: a 4:2 won off level chances ran nearly two goals ahead of them. The two callouts under the list name the match that ran furthest each way, and a direction with no result a full goal clear of the chances gets no card rather than a card built from a rounding.

Windows count back from the most recent recorded match, and only matches attached to this club record are included. Home and away mean the provider-designated side, not a verified physical venue. Scores describe recorded play, not shootout advancement. Unverified periods receive no chance comparison.

How the model works →