xgEdge

SuperLiga (Romania) expected points table 2026/2027

Every SuperLiga (Romania) club ranked on the points its match-by-match chances were worth, with the position the real table gives it and the distance between the two.

FC Dinamo București lead on expected points with 18.35 over 9 matches with xG. FC Petrolul Ploieşti sit 10 places higher in the table than their chances place them: 4 against 14 on expected points. UTA Arad sit 7 places lower in the table than their chances place them: 10 against 3 on expected points.

Table against xPts

  • Higher in the table than on xPts
  • Lower in the table than on xPts
  • Fewer than 3 places apart
SuperLiga (Romania): table position against xPts position Each line joins a club's position in the table, on the left, to its position on expected points, on the right. The same figures are in the Actual and Diff columns of the table below.
Lines in colour: clubs 3 places or more apart. Drawn in colour: UTA Arad (10 in the table, 3 on xPts), FCSB (11 in the table, 4 on xPts), FC Rapid București (2 in the table, 5 on xPts), FC Botoșani (12 in the table, 7 on xPts), CFR 1907 Cluj (8 in the table, 12 on xPts), and FC Petrolul Ploieşti (4 in the table, 14 on xPts).

Ranked on expected points

SuperLiga (Romania) expected points table 2026/2027
# Team P Pts xPts Pts vs xPts Actual Diff
1 FCD 10 23 18.35 +1.65 1 Same place as on expected points
2 UNI 10 20 18.27 −1.27 3 1 place below its expected-points rank
3 UTA 10 12 16.01 −4.01 10 7 places below its expected-points rank
4 FCS 10 12 15.85 −3.85 11 7 places below its expected-points rank
5 FCR 10 21 14.26 +0.74 2 3 places above its expected-points rank
6 FCU 9 15 13.96 +1.04 5 1 place above its expected-points rank
7 FCB 10 11 13.42 −2.42 12 5 places below its expected-points rank
8 FCF 10 14 13.02 −0.02 6 2 places above its expected-points rank
9 FCC 10 13 12.53 −2.53 7 2 places above its expected-points rank
10 SEP 10 13 11.05 +1.95 9 1 place above its expected-points rank
11 FCA 10 11 10.95 +0.05 13 2 places below its expected-points rank
12 CFR 9 13 10.03 +1.97 8 4 places above its expected-points rank
13 SCO 10 10 9.79 +0.21 14 1 place below its expected-points rank
14 FCP 10 19 9.50 +6.50 4 10 places above its expected-points rank
15 FCV 10 8 6.49 −1.49 15 Same place as on expected points
16 FKC 10 1 4.98 −3.98 16 Same place as on expected points

12 of the 16 clubs here have expected figures over fewer matches than they have played. For those clubs every expected figure counts only the matches with xG, and the goals it is compared with come from those same matches.

  • Higher in the table than on xPts
  • Lower in the table than on xPts

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
Pts
— Points
xPts
— Expected points: the points a team's match-by-match xG would be worth on average.
Pts vs xPts
— Actual points minus expected points based on match xG.
Actual
— Position in the real table
Diff
— Places between this ranking and the real table. Up is a club higher in the real table than its expected points place it.

Every club with expected goals behind it is ranked here: these are season totals rather than rates, so a club is not held back by having played fewer matches. The ranking opens once the median club has played 3.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →