xgEdge

Ukrainian Premier League xG difference 2026/2027

Expected-goal difference per match for every Ukrainian Premier League club: the chances a side made, less the chances it allowed, over the matches with xG behind them.

Showing non-penalty xG. Penalties are removed from the expected-goal columns; goals, G − xG and the rates taken from goals are unchanged.

Polissya Zhytomyr lead on expected-goal difference, +1.27 a match over 6 matches with xG. That is 0.44 a match clear of Shakhtar Donetsk. Kudrivka sit at the foot on −1.47 a match.

Attack and defence

Ukrainian Premier League: every club's xG per match against its xGA per match Polissya Zhytomyr Shakhtar Donetsk Dynamo Kyiv LNZ Cherkasy Karpaty Lviv FC Epicentr Dunaivtsi Bukovyna Chernivtsi BUK Zoria Luhansk Kolos Kovalivka FC Livyi Bereh Kyiv FCL Veres Rivne Kudrivka Metalist 1925 MET Chornomorets Odesa FC Kryvbas Kryvyi Rih Obolon Kyiv OBO
Every Ukrainian Premier League club's xG, xGA and xGD per match, by xGD per match
Club xG/match xGA/match xGD/match
POL 2.02 0.74 +1.27
SHA 1.75 0.91 +0.84
DYN 1.72 0.98 +0.74
LNZ 1.80 1.10 +0.69
KAR 1.78 1.38 +0.41
FCE 1.54 1.17 +0.37
BUK 1.86 2.04 −0.18
ZOR 1.17 1.41 −0.24
KOL 1.36 1.69 −0.33
FCL 0.73 1.09 −0.36
VER 0.99 1.92 −0.93
KUD 0.90 2.37 −1.47
MET 4 with xG 2.40 0.92 +1.48
CHO 4 with xG 0.54 1.30 −0.76
FCK 4 with xG 1.17 1.94 −0.76
OBO 4 with xG 0.61 2.23 −1.62
  • Top 3 in the table
  • Other clubs
  • Hollow: fewer than 5 matches with xG.
  • Above average at both ends
  • Below average at both ends

Non-penalty xG. Hover, focus or tap a dot for its figures.

Ranked on xG difference per match

  • Creates more than it allows
  • Allows more than it creates
Ukrainian Premier League xG difference 2026/2027
# Team P npxG npxGA npxGD npxGD/match Pts
1 POL 7 12.10 4.46 +7.64 +1.27 18
2 SHA 7 10.50 5.48 +5.02 +0.84 18
3 DYN 6 10.30 5.89 +4.41 +0.74 13
4 LNZ 7 8.98 5.52 +3.46 +0.69 8
5 KAR 7 12.49 9.64 +2.85 +0.41 14
6 FCE 7 10.76 8.20 +2.56 +0.37 8
7 BUK 7 13.05 14.30 −1.25 −0.18 7
8 ZOR 7 5.85 7.03 −1.18 −0.24 8
9 KOL 6 6.81 8.44 −1.63 −0.33 5
10 FCL 6 3.67 5.47 −1.80 −0.36 7
11 VER 7 4.97 9.61 −4.64 −0.93 9
12 KUD 7 5.42 14.21 −8.79 −1.47 2
— MET 4 with xG 5 9.60 3.67 +5.93 — 9
— FCK 4 with xG 6 4.69 7.75 −3.06 — 5
— CHO 4 with xG 6 2.16 5.20 −3.04 — 5
— OBO 4 with xG 6 2.42 8.90 −6.48 — 4

12 of the 16 clubs here have expected figures over fewer matches than they have played. For those clubs every expected figure counts only the matches with xG, and the goals it is compared with come from those same matches.

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
npxG
— Non-penalty expected goals: xG with penalties removed
npxGA
— Non-penalty expected goals against: xGA with penalties removed
npxGD
— npxG minus npxGA
npxGD/match
— npxG minus npxGA, per match with xG data
Pts
— Points

A club is ranked once it has 3 matches with xG and at least 75% of what the median club has played. Below that its row stays in the table, its rates are dashed and it sorts last.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →