xgEdge

Veikkausliiga xG difference 2026/2027

Expected-goal difference per match for every Veikkausliiga club: the chances a side made, less the chances it allowed, over the matches with xG behind them.

Inter Turku lead on expected-goal difference, +0.86 a match over 22 matches with xG. That is 0.16 a match clear of KuPS. IFK Mariehamn sit at the foot on −1.41 a match.

  • Best attack

    1.96 KuPS

    41.20 xG in 21 matches

  • Best defence

    0.93 Inter Turku

    20.37 xGA in 22 matches

  • Widest xG difference

    +0.86 Inter Turku

    +18.88 xGD in 22 matches

Attack and defence

Veikkausliiga: every club's xG per match against its xGA per match Inter Turku KuPS KUP HJK FC Lahti IF Gnistan VPS SJK TPS Ilves ILV AC Oulu ACO FF Jaro IFK Mariehamn IFK
Every Veikkausliiga club's xG, xGA and xGD per match, by xGD per match
Club xG/match xGA/match xGD/match
INT 1.78 0.93 +0.86
KUP 1.96 1.26 +0.70
HJK 1.77 1.32 +0.45
FCL 1.80 1.42 +0.38
IFG 1.61 1.43 +0.18
VPS 1.56 1.44 +0.12
SJK 1.71 1.67 +0.04
TPS 1.50 1.58 −0.08
ILV 1.72 1.94 −0.21
ACO 1.20 1.58 −0.37
FFJ 1.21 1.71 −0.50
IFK 1.10 2.50 −1.41
  • Top 3 in the table
  • Other clubs
  • Above average at both ends
  • Below average at both ends

All xG. Hover, focus or tap a dot for its figures.

Ranked on xG difference per match

  • Creates more than it allows
  • Allows more than it creates
Veikkausliiga xG difference 2026/2027
# Team P xG xGA xGD xGD/match Pts
1 INT 25 39.25 20.37 +18.88 +0.86 48
2 KUP 25 41.20 26.44 +14.76 +0.70 48
3 HJK 25 37.11 27.68 +9.43 +0.45 43
4 FCL 25 39.65 31.29 +8.36 +0.38 36
5 IFG 25 33.81 30.08 +3.73 +0.18 41
6 VPS 25 34.24 31.63 +2.61 +0.12 34
7 SJK 25 39.28 38.45 +0.83 +0.04 24
8 TPS 25 31.50 33.21 −1.71 −0.08 32
9 ILV 25 39.66 44.58 −4.92 −0.21 34
10 ACO 25 26.46 34.68 −8.22 −0.37 34
11 FFJ 25 27.93 39.33 −11.40 −0.50 17
12 IFK 25 25.20 57.55 −32.35 −1.41 17

12 of the 12 clubs here have expected figures over fewer matches than they have played. For those clubs every expected figure counts only the matches with xG, and the goals it is compared with come from those same matches.

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
xG
— Expected goals: the summed chance quality of the shots a team took
xGA
— Expected goals against: the summed chance quality of the shots a team allowed
xGD
— xG minus xGA
xGD/match
— xG minus xGA, per match with xG data
Pts
— Points

A club is ranked once it has 3 matches with xG and at least 75% of what the median club has played. Below that its row stays in the table, its rates are dashed and it sorts last.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →