xgEdge

Results

FC Groningen results 2026/2027

FC Groningen · Eredivisie 2026/2027 →

FC Groningen's recorded results for 2026/2027, newest first, with the available xG behind each score. Compare outcomes with the chances created and conceded, then open a match for more detail.

Showing 4 of 4 matching results

7 played this season

Reset filters

Results

Wins – draws – losses (W–D–L)
2 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss

7 pts 9–6 goals +3 GD

Chances

Provider xG / xGA
6.34 – 5.87
1.59 – 1.47 per match
xGD
+0.47
+0.12 per match
xG record
2 with the chances, 0 with even chances, 2 against them

Small sample: 4 matches.

Comparable xG: 4 of 4 completed results.

Points vs xPts Model

7 pts 6.1 xPts

+0.9 vs xPts

Small sample: 4 matches.

Matched xPts: 4 of 4 selected results.

Model · How xPts works →

Match points use 3 for a win, 1 for a draw and 0 for a loss, before deductions or sanctions.

Points vs xPts uses only matches with available xPts on both sides of the comparison.

What the results say

Season · Eredivisie · Home

FC Groningen's mixed record matches the chances at both ends. They out-created the opponent in 2 of 4 matches, for +0.47 xG difference overall on 6.34–5.87. Their points total of 7 sits 0.9 above the model's 6.1 xPts, so the results have slightly outrun the chances. The loss against Fortuna Sittard came with +1.05 xGD.

Points minus xPts, match by match

Over these 4 results FC Groningen are 0.87 points above their xPts. The gap was widest at +2.10, against FC Utrecht on Sun 09/08.

Points
7
xPts
6.13
Gap
+0.87
Sun 09/08 Fri 28/08 Sun 06/09 Fri 18/09 -1 0 +1 +2 +3 +2.10 -0.07 +0.10 +0.87 +2.10 -2.17 +0.17 +0.77 Running gap points − xPts Each match points − xPts
FC Groningen: Points vs xPts, the gap after every selected result
Date Opponent Points xPts Match gap Running gap
Sun 09/08 FC Utrecht 3 0.90 +2.10 +2.10
Fri 28/08 Fortuna Sittard 0 2.17 -2.17 -0.07
Sun 06/09 FC Twente 1 0.83 +0.17 +0.10
Fri 18/09 PEC Zwolle 3 2.23 +0.77 +0.87

Scores and xG

FC Groningen first

  • Home Eredivisie Win backed by the chances

    xG 1.39

    xGA 0.43

    xGD +0.96

    3:0 Win
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · PEC Zwolle, Fri 18/09

    The team won and had a positive xG difference. The chances support the direction of the result, without making a judgment about fairness.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    3
    Post-match model xPts
    2.23
    Points minus xPts
    +0.77

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Home Eredivisie Draw against the chances

    xG 1.48

    xGA 2.30

    xGD -0.82

    2:2 Draw
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · FC Twente, Sun 06/09

    The match was drawn although the team recorded less xG. The outcome was stronger than that chance difference suggests.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    1
    Post-match model xPts
    0.83
    Points minus xPts
    +0.17

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Home Eredivisie Loss against the chances

    xG 1.92

    xGA 0.87

    xGD +1.05

    2:3 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Fortuna Sittard, Fri 28/08

    The team lost despite recording a positive xG difference. The outcome was weaker than that chance advantage suggests.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    2.17
    Points minus xPts
    -2.17

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Home Eredivisie Win against the chances

    xG 1.55

    xGA 2.27

    xGD -0.72

    2:1 Win
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · FC Utrecht, Sun 09/08

    The team won despite recording less xG than its opponent. That contrast does not make the win impossible or establish why it happened.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    3
    Post-match model xPts
    0.90
    Points minus xPts
    +2.10

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →

Reading these results

xG is the provider's estimate of chances created; xGA is the opponent's xG. xGD is the difference. Labels compare the recorded outcome with those chances; they are interpretations, not judgments about fairness.

xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

How each figure on this page is read

Every xG bar is drawn on one fixed scale: full width is 7.20 xG, the same on every card and in every window, so two cards can be compared by eye. A rarer match above that is capped with a hatched end, and the figure beside the bar still gives its value.

An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

Goal difference minus xGD says how far a scoreline finished from the chances behind it: a 4:2 won off level chances ran nearly two goals ahead of them. The two callouts under the list name the match that ran furthest each way, and a direction with no result a full goal clear of the chances gets no card rather than a card built from a rounding.

Windows count back from the most recent recorded match, and only matches attached to this club record are included. Home and away mean the provider-designated side, not a verified physical venue. Scores describe recorded play, not shootout advancement. Unverified periods receive no chance comparison.

How the model works →