xgEdge

Russian Premier League expected points table 2026/2027

Every Russian Premier League club ranked on the points its match-by-match chances were worth, with the position the real table gives it and the distance between the two.

FK Krasnodar lead on expected points with 3.74 over 2 matches with xG. That is 2.06 clear of Akhmat Grozny. FC Spartak Moscow sit 6 places higher in the table than their chances place them: 2 against 8 on expected points. Rodina Moscow sit 10 places lower in the table than their chances place them: 15 against 5 on expected points.

Table against xPts

  • Higher in the table than on xPts
  • Lower in the table than on xPts
  • Fewer than 3 places apart
Russian Premier League: table position against xPts position Each line joins a club's position in the table, on the left, to its position on expected points, on the right. The same figures are in the Actual and Diff columns of the table below.
Lines in colour: clubs 3 places or more apart. Drawn in colour: Akhmat Grozny (10 in the table, 2 on xPts), Orenburg (11 in the table, 3 on xPts), Krylya Sovetov Samara (9 in the table, 4 on xPts), Rodina Moscow (15 in the table, 5 on xPts), Lokomotiv Moscow (14 in the table, 6 on xPts), Akron Togliatti (12 in the table, 8 on xPts), CSKA Moscow (3 in the table, 8 on xPts), Dynamo Moscow (4 in the table, 8 on xPts), FC Rostov (13 in the table, 8 on xPts), FC Spartak Moscow (2 in the table, 8 on xPts), Fakel Voronezh (16 in the table, 8 on xPts), and Zenit St. Petersburg (5 in the table, 8 on xPts).

Ranked on expected points

Russian Premier League expected points table 2026/2027
# Team P Pts xPts Pts vs xPts Actual Diff
1 FKK 9 21 3.74 +0.26 1 Same place as on expected points
2 AKH 9 10 1.68 −0.68 10 8 places below its expected-points rank
3 ORE 9 9 1.48 −0.48 11 8 places below its expected-points rank
4 KRY 9 11 1.46 +1.54 9 5 places below its expected-points rank
5 ROD 9 5 1.33 −1.33 15 10 places below its expected-points rank
6 LOK 9 7 1.06 −0.06 14 8 places below its expected-points rank
7 RUB 9 12 0.33 −0.33 6 1 place above its expected-points rank
8 AKR 9 8 — — 12 4 places below its expected-points rank
8 BAL 9 11 — — 8 Same place as on expected points
8 CSK 9 19 — — 3 5 places above its expected-points rank
8 DIN 9 12 — — 7 1 place above its expected-points rank
8 DYN 9 19 — — 4 4 places above its expected-points rank
8 FCR 9 8 — — 13 5 places below its expected-points rank
8 FCS 9 19 — — 2 6 places above its expected-points rank
8 FAK 9 3 — — 16 8 places below its expected-points rank
8 ZEN 9 18 — — 5 3 places above its expected-points rank

16 of the 16 clubs here have expected figures over fewer matches than they have played. For those clubs every expected figure counts only the matches with xG, and the goals it is compared with come from those same matches.

  • Higher in the table than on xPts
  • Lower in the table than on xPts

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
Pts
— Points
xPts
— Expected points: the points a team's match-by-match xG would be worth on average.
Pts vs xPts
— Actual points minus expected points based on match xG.
Actual
— Position in the real table
Diff
— Places between this ranking and the real table. Up is a club higher in the real table than its expected points place it.

Every club with expected goals behind it is ranked here: these are season totals rather than rates, so a club is not held back by having played fewer matches. The ranking opens once the median club has played 3.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →