xgEdge

Swiss Super League expected points table 2026/2027

Every Swiss Super League club ranked on the points its match-by-match chances were worth, with the position the real table gives it and the distance between the two.

Young Boys lead on expected points with 17.13 over 9 matches with xG. Basel sit 4 places higher in the table than their chances place them: 4 against 8 on expected points. Grasshopper Club Zürich sit 3 places lower in the table than their chances place them: 10 against 7 on expected points.

Table against xPts

  • Higher in the table than on xPts
  • Lower in the table than on xPts
  • Fewer than 3 places apart
Swiss Super League: table position against xPts position Each line joins a club's position in the table, on the left, to its position on expected points, on the right. The same figures are in the Actual and Diff columns of the table below.
Lines in colour: clubs 3 places or more apart. Drawn in colour: FC Lugano (1 in the table, 4 on xPts), Grasshopper Club Zürich (10 in the table, 7 on xPts), Basel (4 in the table, 8 on xPts), and FC Zürich (7 in the table, 10 on xPts).

Ranked on expected points

Swiss Super League expected points table 2026/2027
# Team P Pts xPts Pts vs xPts Actual Diff
1 YOU 9 19 17.13 +1.87 2 1 place below its expected-points rank
2 FCS 9 19 17.08 +1.92 3 1 place below its expected-points rank
3 FCS 9 13 15.36 −2.36 5 2 places below its expected-points rank
4 FCL 9 25 15.35 +9.65 1 3 places above its expected-points rank
5 FCL 9 12 12.22 −0.22 6 1 place below its expected-points rank
6 SER 9 10 11.67 −1.67 8 2 places below its expected-points rank
7 GRA 9 8 11.60 −3.60 10 3 places below its expected-points rank
8 BAS 9 13 11.30 +1.70 4 4 places above its expected-points rank
9 FCV 9 6 10.61 −4.61 11 2 places below its expected-points rank
10 FCZ 9 11 10.07 +0.93 7 3 places above its expected-points rank
11 FCT 9 10 9.00 +1.00 9 2 places above its expected-points rank
12 FCL 9 6 8.42 −2.42 12 Same place as on expected points
  • Higher in the table than on xPts
  • Lower in the table than on xPts

A gap can come from finishing, goalkeeping, game state or chance. xG and xPts are model estimates, not the result a team deserved.

About these figures What each column measures, and the thresholds this ranking is under. Show
P
— Matches played
Pts
— Points
xPts
— Expected points: the points a team's match-by-match xG would be worth on average.
Pts vs xPts
— Actual points minus expected points based on match xG.
Actual
— Position in the real table
Diff
— Places between this ranking and the real table. Up is a club higher in the real table than its expected points place it.

Every club with expected goals behind it is ranked here: these are season totals rather than rates, so a club is not held back by having played fewer matches. The ranking opens once the median club has played 3.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →