xgEdge

Saturday, 12/09/2026 at 16:00

Full time
Match report · Premier League

Crystal Palace 2:3 Ipswich Town

Crystal Palace Home 0.62 xG · 11 shots
Ipswich Town Away 1.67 xG · 12 shots
23 The scoreline reflected the chances

Crystal Palace were the model's likeliest winner before kick-off at 47%. Ipswich Town won 3–2. The biggest difference was Crystal Palace's attack: 0.62 xG against 1.69 projected (−1.07). Ipswich Town produced 1.67 xG against 1.24 projected (+0.43).

Goals

  1. 14' Anan Khalaili Crystal Palace · 0.04 xG chance 1–0
  2. 23' Emersonn Ipswich Town · 0.35 xG chance 1–1
  3. 45' Leif Davis Ipswich Town · 0.47 xG chance 1–2
  4. 75' Jørgen Strand Larsen Crystal Palace · 0.04 xG chance 2–2
  5. 90' Zian Flemming Ipswich Town · 0.42 xG chance 2–3

The model against the result

priced before kick-off
Crystal Palace
47%
Draw
28%
Ipswich Town
25% What happened

Data coverage One of these teams has only 3 matches in the model window, short of the 10 the model wants. Read the projection as a direction rather than as a number.

Projected vs produced

Expected goals
Crystal Palace The model projected 1.69 Produced 0.62 Difference -1.07
Ipswich Town The model projected 1.24 Produced 1.67 Difference +0.43

Crystal Palace produced 1.07 xG less than projected

Projected before kick-off Produced on the night

The shots behind it

Crystal Palace Ipswich Town
Shots
11
12
On target
4
6
Inside the box
9
8
xG per shot
0.06
0.14
Open play xG
0.61
1.60
Set-piece xG
0.00
0.07
Penalties
—
—
Shot-level xG may differ from the published match total

The provider publishes the match total separately from its shot-by-shot values. Those values are rounded to two decimals and, leaving out penalties and own goals, add up to its non-penalty xG: 0.62 for Crystal Palace.

Shot map

Both teams shown attacking the same goal for comparison.

Ipswich Town · Leif Davis · 45' · Goal · 6 m · 0.47 xG Ipswich Town · Zian Flemming · 90' · Goal · 4 m · 0.42 xG Ipswich Town · Emersonn · 23' · Goal · 7 m · 0.35 xG Crystal Palace · Anan Khalaili · 79' · No goal · 9 m · 0.16 xG Ipswich Town · Jack Clarke · 55' · No goal · 11 m · 0.15 xG Crystal Palace · Ben Chilwell · 87' · No goal · 13 m · 0.11 xG Crystal Palace · Adam Wharton · 11' · No goal · 31 m · 0.08 xG Ipswich Town · Zian Flemming · 83' · No goal · 8 m · 0.07 xG Crystal Palace · Quinten Timber · 68' · No goal · 5 m · 0.05 xG Crystal Palace · Quinten Timber · 74' · No goal · 13 m · 0.05 xG Ipswich Town · Zian Flemming · 90' · No goal · 21 m · 0.05 xG Crystal Palace · Anan Khalaili · 14' · Goal · 13 m · 0.04 xG Crystal Palace · Jørgen Strand Larsen · 18' · No goal · 18 m · 0.04 xG Ipswich Town · Emersonn · 45' · No goal · 10 m · 0.04 xG Crystal Palace · Jørgen Strand Larsen · 75' · Goal · 13 m · 0.04 xG Crystal Palace · Anan Khalaili · 12' · No goal · 9 m · 0.03 xG Ipswich Town · Emersonn · 51' · No goal · 8 m · 0.03 xG Ipswich Town · Julio Enciso · 66' · No goal · 21 m · 0.03 xG Ipswich Town · Leif Davis · 90' · No goal · 10 m · 0.03 xG Ipswich Town · Julio Enciso · 33' · No goal · 28 m · 0.02 xG Crystal Palace · Jørgen Strand Larsen · 18' · No goal · 3 m · 0.01 xG Ipswich Town · Jaden Philogene-Bidace · 82' · No goal · 26 m · 0.01 xG Crystal Palace · Anan Khalaili · 71' · No goal · 3 m · 0.00 xG

All shots

23 shots · 2.28 xG

Hover, focus or tap a shot to read it.

  • Crystal Palace
  • Ipswich Town
  • Filled = goal
  • Dot area = xG (the smallest chances drawn at a minimum size)

Recent form

Last 6 · xG per match
Crystal Palace

1.34 xG created 2.06 xGA

  • L 0.73 created, 1.66 conceded against Manchester City
  • D 1.72 created, 1.71 conceded against Brentford
  • L 0.98 created, 2.53 conceded against Arsenal
  • L 1.96 created, 1.12 conceded against Everton
  • L 0.66 created, 2.21 conceded against Manchester City
  • W 1.97 created, 3.14 conceded against Fulham
Ipswich Town

1.52 xG created 1.97 xGA

  • W 1.80 created, 0.66 conceded against Sunderland
  • L 2.01 created, 4.56 conceded against Manchester United
  • L 0.75 created, 0.69 conceded against Liverpool

xG created xG conceded (xGA) W / D / L: the match result

Pre-match model & market record

5 opportunities flagged4 won1 lost

  • Won
  • Won
  • Lost
  • Won
  • Won
View pre-match record
The outcomes the model flagged on Crystal Palace against Ipswich Town before kick-off, in the order they ranked, with the price, the edge and what became of each.
Selection Price Edge Result
Both teams to score 1.70 +8.2% Won
Ipswich Town 2+ goals 3.00 +7.1% Won
Draw 3.80 +6.8% Lost
Ipswich Town to score 1.40 +3.4% Won
Over 1.5 goals 1.22 +1.4% Won

Pre-match model vs market

Outcome Model Market Difference Fair odds
Crystal Palace 46.6% 49.5% −2.9 pp 2.15
Draw 28.1% 24.9% +3.2 pp 3.56
Ipswich Town 25.3% 25.6% −0.3 pp 3.96

Other markets

Outcome Model Market Difference Fair odds
Crystal Palace to score 84.0% 81.1% +2.9 pp 1.19
Crystal Palace not to score 16.0% 18.9% −2.9 pp 6.25
Ipswich Town to score 73.9% 66.3% +7.6 pp 1.35
Ipswich Town not to score 26.1% 33.7% −7.6 pp 3.83
Both teams to score 63.7% 54.7% +9.0 pp 1.57
Both teams not to score 36.3% 45.3% −9.0 pp 2.75
Crystal Palace 2+ goals 52.1% 50.0% +2.1 pp 1.92
Crystal Palace at most 1 goal 47.9% 50.0% −2.1 pp 2.09
Ipswich Town 2+ goals 35.7% 31.3% +4.5 pp 2.80
Ipswich Town at most 1 goal 64.3% 68.7% −4.5 pp 1.56
Over 1.5 goals 83.0% 78.0% +5.0 pp 1.21
Under 1.5 goals 17.0% 22.0% −5.0 pp 5.87
Over 2.5 goals 57.8% 54.9% +2.9 pp 1.73
Under 2.5 goals 42.2% 45.1% −2.9 pp 2.37

Prices and probabilities are the ones stored before kick-off; nothing here is recalculated. Edge is the model's probability times the price, minus one, so a flagged outcome that lost is the ordinary case rather than a contradiction.

Model details

· 1 warning
Show
Fit window
the last 20 matches, recency weighted (a match 107 days old counts half)
Crystal Palace sample
20 matches
Ipswich Town sample
3 matches
Computed
1 hour before kick-off
Prices taken
1 hour before kick-off

Warnings

  • Ipswich Town has only 3 matches in the database. Below 10 matches the estimate is very unreliable.

Limitations

The model reads expected goals and nothing else. It does not know the lineups, who is injured or suspended, what either side has to play for, the weather, or how congested the schedule around this match is.