xgEdge

Championship table 2026/2027

The Championship table for 2026/2027, with expected goals (xG), xGA and expected points (xPts) beside every club's points. Middlesbrough lead on expected points with 22.37 xPts, while Swansea City top the table.

Showing non-penalty xG. Penalties are removed from xG, xGA and xGD; xPts is unchanged.

Championship 2026/2027 table
# restore the table order Team P sort descending W sort descending D sort descending L sort descending GF sort descending GA sort descending GD sort descending Pts sort descending npxG sort descending npxGA sort descending npxGD sort descending xPts sort descending Pts vs xPts sort descending
1 SWA 11 7 2 2 16 8 +8 23 17.27 11.00 +6.27 17.90 +5.10
2 WHU 11 6 4 1 30 12 +18 22 20.83 10.94 +9.89 20.78 +1.22
3 MID 11 6 4 1 22 16 +6 22 21.94 10.90 +11.04 22.37 −0.37
4 SOU 11 6 3 2 21 10 +11 21 17.82 12.20 +5.62 19.02 +1.98
5 BIR 11 5 5 1 20 11 +9 20 17.80 12.94 +4.86 19.30 +0.70
6 WES 11 6 2 3 15 12 +3 20 12.10 14.94 −2.84 13.70 +6.30
7 STO 11 6 1 4 18 16 +2 19 8.49 16.43 −7.94 10.05 +8.95
8 WOL 11 5 3 3 19 16 +3 18 17.04 10.00 +7.04 20.93 −2.93
9 QUE 11 4 5 2 15 12 +3 17 15.48 12.89 +2.59 17.76 −0.76
10 BLA 11 4 3 4 17 16 +1 15 9.66 15.36 −5.70 9.75 +5.25
11 SHE 11 4 3 4 15 14 +1 15 10.90 14.91 −4.01 11.77 +3.23
12 MIL 11 4 3 4 18 18 0 15 19.35 13.42 +5.93 18.48 −3.48
13 POR 11 4 3 4 14 14 0 15 13.11 11.90 +1.21 16.60 −1.60
14 WRE 11 3 5 3 15 16 −1 14 12.06 12.02 +0.04 15.39 −1.39
15 BOL 11 4 2 5 15 18 −3 14 13.12 18.81 −5.69 12.62 +1.38
16 BRI 11 4 2 5 12 15 −3 14 13.43 12.81 +0.62 15.84 −1.84
17 CHA 11 3 5 3 10 15 −5 14 11.41 14.61 −3.20 11.02 +2.98
18 LIN 11 3 3 5 9 19 −10 12 11.71 14.44 −2.73 15.09 −3.09
19 CAR 11 2 5 4 18 17 +1 11 18.34 15.90 +2.44 16.60 −5.60
20 WAT 11 3 2 6 10 19 −9 11 11.26 18.83 −7.57 9.65 +1.35
21 NOR 11 3 0 8 17 21 −4 9 13.86 17.25 −3.39 13.86 −4.86
22 BUR 11 1 5 5 16 21 −5 8 12.15 15.66 −3.51 11.60 −3.60
23 DER 11 1 3 7 9 20 −11 6 9.70 17.53 −7.83 11.78 −5.78
24 PRE 11 1 1 9 9 24 −15 4 12.43 15.57 −3.14 13.16 −9.16
  • More points than xPts
  • Fewer points than xPts

The provider published an implausible non-penalty figure for 2 of these matches — under 50% of the match total, which needs more penalties than a match usually has. Those matches fall back to total xG in the npxG columns.

How to read this table
xG
Expected goals: the summed chance quality of the shots a club took. A chance scored nine times in ten is worth 0.9.
xGA
Expected goals against: the same measure for the shots a club allowed.
xGD
xG minus xGA: how far a club's chances outweighed its opponents', or the other way round.
xPts
Expected points: the points a club's match-by-match xG would be worth on average. Each match's two xG figures become chances of a win, a draw and a loss, and a win is worth 3 and a draw 1.
Pts vs xPts
Actual points minus expected points based on match xG. Positive, drawn in green, is more points than the chances were worth on average; negative, in red, is fewer. It measures the gap and says nothing about its cause.
npxG
Non-penalty xG: xG with penalties removed, offered where the competition's figures support it. It changes xG, xGA and xGD; xPts is always worked out from all xG.

Expected points are read off the same score matrix that prices the board: each played match's two xG totals are taken as scoring rates, and the team's share is 3 × P(win) + 1 × P(draw), summed over the season. Understat arrives at the same figure by simulating each shot, which needs per-shot data, held here for %{competitions}. Passes per defensive action and deep completions are not shown because no source here ingests the event data behind them.

Learn how xgEdge calculates these figures →