xgEdge

Motherwell's recorded results for 2026/2027, newest first, with the available xG behind each score. Compare outcomes with the chances created and conceded, then open a match for more detail.

Showing 4 of 4 matching results

7 played this season

Reset filters

Results

Wins – draws – losses (W–D–L)
1 win, 1 draw, 2 losses

4 pts 6–7 goals −1 GD

Chances

Provider xG / xGA
5.72 – 9.53
1.43 – 2.38 per match
xGD
-3.81
-0.95 per match
xG record
0 with the chances, 2 with even chances, 2 against them

Small sample: 4 matches.

Comparable xG: 4 of 4 completed results.

Points vs xPts Model

4 pts 3.9 xPts

+0.1 vs xPts

Small sample: 4 matches.

Matched xPts: 4 of 4 selected results.

Model · How xPts works →

Match points use 3 for a win, 1 for a draw and 0 for a loss, before deductions or sanctions.

Points vs xPts uses only matches with available xPts on both sides of the comparison.

What the results say

Season · All competitions · Away

Motherwell's mixed record runs ahead of the chances they created and conceded. They out-created the opponent in 1 of 4 matches, for −3.81 xG difference overall on 5.72–9.53. Their points total of 4 lands on the model's 3.9 xPts, so the results have followed the chances closely.

Points minus xPts, match by match

Over these 4 results Motherwell are 0.13 points above their xPts. The gap was widest at +1.56, against Hibernian on Sun 02/08.

Points
4
xPts
3.87
Gap
+0.13
Sun 02/08 Sun 30/08 Sat 05/09 Sat 19/09 -1 0 +1 +2 +1.56 +1.31 +1.26 +0.13 +1.56 -0.25 -0.05 -1.13 Running gap points − xPts Each match points − xPts
Motherwell: Points vs xPts, the gap after every selected result
Date Opponent Points xPts Match gap Running gap
Sun 02/08 Hibernian 3 1.44 +1.56 +1.56
Sun 30/08 St. Mirren 1 1.25 -0.25 +1.31
Sat 05/09 Rangers 0 0.05 -0.05 +1.26
Sat 19/09 Dundee FC 0 1.13 -1.13 +0.13

Scores and xG

Motherwell first

  • Away Scottish Premiership Loss backed by the chances

    xG 1.10

    xGA 1.36

    xGD -0.26

    1:2 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Dundee FC, Sat 19/09

    The team lost and recorded less xG than its opponent. The direction of the result aligns with the chance difference.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    1.13
    Points minus xPts
    -1.13

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away Scottish Premiership Loss backed by the chances

    xG 0.51

    xGA 3.93

    xGD -3.42

    0:1 Loss
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Rangers, Sat 05/09

    The team lost and recorded less xG than its opponent. The direction of the result aligns with the chance difference.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    0
    Post-match model xPts
    0.05
    Points minus xPts
    -0.05

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away Scottish Premiership Draw with even chances

    xG 2.11

    xGA 2.32

    xGD -0.21

    3:3 Draw
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · St. Mirren, Sun 30/08

    The match was drawn and the chance difference was approximately even. The two readings broadly align.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    1
    Post-match model xPts
    1.25
    Points minus xPts
    -0.25

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →
  • Away Scottish Premiership Win with even chances

    xG 2.00

    xGA 1.92

    xGD +0.08

    2:1 Win
    Match analysis →
    Why this label · Hibernian, Sun 02/08

    The team won, while the chance difference was approximately even. The outcome was stronger than that difference alone suggests.

    An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

    Points
    3
    Post-match model xPts
    1.44
    Points minus xPts
    +1.56

    xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

    Learn how xG and xPts are calculated →

Reading these results

xG is the provider's estimate of chances created; xGA is the opponent's xG. xGD is the difference. Labels compare the recorded outcome with those chances; they are interpretations, not judgments about fairness.

xPts is our post-match model's 3 × win probability + draw probability using the match's provider xG, not a pre-match forecast.

How each figure on this page is read

Every xG bar is drawn on one fixed scale: full width is 7.20 xG, the same on every card and in every window, so two cards can be compared by eye. A rarer match above that is capped with a hatched end, and the figure beside the bar still gives its value.

An xGD of at least +0.25 is positive; at most −0.25 is negative; between them is approximately even. The band uses unrounded figures and is an editorial guide, not a statistical confidence threshold. The chip on each result reads one of three ways: backed by the chances, with even chances, or against them. Counted over the selection, those three are the xG record on the Chances card — 5–1–0 reads as five results with the chances, one even and none against them.

Goal difference minus xGD says how far a scoreline finished from the chances behind it: a 4:2 won off level chances ran nearly two goals ahead of them. The two callouts under the list name the match that ran furthest each way, and a direction with no result a full goal clear of the chances gets no card rather than a card built from a rounding.

Windows count back from the most recent recorded match, and only matches attached to this club record are included. Home and away mean the provider-designated side, not a verified physical venue. Scores describe recorded play, not shootout advancement. Unverified periods receive no chance comparison.

How the model works →